CORRECTION OF THE MOTOR STEREOTYPE OF WOMEN WITH TYPE ONE DIABETES MELLITUS AFTER CAESAREAN SECTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21802/artm.2023.2.26.24Ключові слова:
physical therapy, rehabilitation, postpartum period, caesarean section, type I diabetes.Анотація
Abstract. The Purpose is to determine the effectiveness of the use of physical therapy for the correction of the motor stereotype of women with type I diabetes that underwent cesarean section in the postpartum period.
Methods 35 women with type 1 diabetes who underwent abdominal delivery (caesarean section) 1 month before the initial examination took part in the study. The control group consisted of 17 women, who recovered in the postpartum period without rehabilitation interventions or according to self-selected methods. 18 women of the comparison group were engaged in a physical therapy program, the effectiveness of which is presented in this study, which lasted 1 month. Within its framework, kinesitherapy was performed with women (therapeutic exercises for the upper and lower limbs, back, abdomen, chest; functional training to correct the movements of habitual activities and those that take care of a child); manual massage (back, abdomen, lower limbs). Means of physical therapy were used to improve the physical qualities of women - flexibility, strength, endurance, dexterity, speed; normalization of psycho-emotional status, which can be changed due to the risk of postpartum depression; improvement of peripheral blood circulation, changed due to diabetic angiopathy; improvement of sensitivity of peripheral tissues and neuromuscular control, altered due to diabetic neuropathy; improvement of tissue sensitivity to insulin and normalization of glucose utilization by tissues.
The effectiveness of physical status correction was performed according to the standard Functional Movement Screen technique.
Results The movement capabilities of women with diabetes according to the Functional Movement Screen in the postpartum period were relatively low, which was due to a long period of reduced physical activity, changes in the biomechanics of the body, and postpartum reorganization of the body.
During the re-examination, the improvement in exercise performance was (respectively in the control group and the comparison group): "deep squat" – 11.9% and 49.2%; "hurdle step" – 17.2% and 31.7%; "in-line lunge" – 35.4% and 86.8%; "shoulder mobility" – 14.0% and 50.3%; "active straight leg raise" – 24.1% and 47.0%; "trunk stability push-up" – 20.0% and 60.4%; "rotary stability" – 34.0% and 67.1%. This is evidenced by the results of FMS in women of the control group, which were statistically significantly better (p<0.05) compared to the original data, but the number of women with low scores was still significant. At the same time, the determination of FMS parameters in women of the comparison group during the repeated examination showed the feasibility of using physical therapy to improve the condition of women with diabetes in the postpartum period, since in this group the repeated results were better not only the initial levels, but also the corresponding indicators of the control group upon re-examination (p<0.05).
Conclusions After the implementation of a physical therapy program with the use of therapeutic exercises of various orientations, functional training, a statistically significantly better result was found on all tests of the Functional Movement Screen compared to women with type I diabetes who recovered after cesarean section on their own. Therefore, it is advisable to prescribe physical therapy in the process of postpartum recovery of women with diabetes in order to improve their movement pattern and speed up recovery.
Завантажити
Посилання
International Diabetes Federation IDF Diabetes Atlas 2021|IDF Diabetes Atlas. 2021. Available online: https://diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth-edition/
Benhalima K, Beunen K, Siegelaar SE, et al. Management of type 1 diabetes in pregnancy: update on lifestyle, pharmacological treatment, and novel technologies for achieving glycaemic targets. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023; S2213-8587(23)00116-X. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(23)00116-X
Ferry P, Dunne FP, Meagher C, Lennon R, Egan AM, Newman C. Attendance at pre-pregnancy care clinics for women with type 1 diabetes: A scoping review. Diabet Med. 2023; 40(3):e15014. doi:10.1111/dme.15014
Choy KHA, Wong T, Cao RHM, Flack JR. Fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus in a GDM pregnancy: early recognition is vital for maternal and fetal outcomes. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2022; 2022:22-0262. doi:10.1530/EDM-22-0262
Lee TTM, Murphy HR. What's new in the management of type 1 diabetes in pregnancy? Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2022; 83(12):1-10. doi:10.12968/hmed.2022.0412
Malaza N, Masete M, Adam S, Dias S, Nyawo T, Pheiffer C. A Systematic Review to Compare Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Pregestational Diabetes and Gestational Diabetes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(17):10846. Published 2022 Aug 31. doi:10.3390/ijerph191710846
Yamamoto JM, Murphy HR. Emerging Technologies for the Management of Type 1 Diabetes in Pregnancy. Curr Diab Rep. 2018; 18(1):4. Published 2018 Jan 30. doi:10.1007/s11892-018-0973-9
Ostman C, Jewiss D, King N, Smart NA. Clinical outcomes to exercise training in type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018; 139:380-391. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2017.11.036
Reddy R, Wittenberg A, Castle JR, et al. Effect of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2019; 43(6):406-414.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.08.193
Kuravska Yu, Aravitska M, Churpiy I, Fedorivska L, Yaniv O. Efficacy of correction of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction using physical therapy in women who underwent Caesarean section. J Phys Educ Sport. 2022; 22(3):715-723. doi:10.7752/jpes.2022.03090
Kuravska YuV, Aravitska MG. Efektyvnist vidnovlennya psykhoemotsiynogo ta fizychnogo statusu zhinok, yaki perenesly kesariv roztyn, zasobamy fizychnoyi terapiyi. Art of Medicine. 2022; 1 (21):50-55. DOI: 10.21802/artm.2022.1.21.50
Grygus I, Chovpylo M, Ortenburher D. Rol fizychnoyi aktyvnosti v protsesi fizychnoyi reabilitatsiyi vahitnykh. Fizychne vykhovannya, sport i kultura zdorovya u suchasnomu suspilstvi. 2018; (42):102-10 https://doi.org/10.29038/2220-7481-2018-02-102-110
Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom BJ, Voight M. Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014; 9(3):396-409. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4060319/
Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom BJ, Voight M. Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function part 2. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014; 9(4):549-563. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4127517/
Aravitska MG. Zmini profilyu rukhovoyi diyezdatnosti cholovikiv ta zhinok z ozhirinnyam pid vplivom programi fizichnoyi terapiyi. Ukrayinskiy zhurnal meditsini, biologiyi ta sportu. 2020; 4(26):297-306. DOI: 10.26693/jmbs05.04.297
ISSN
ISSN 








